.. DO NOT EDIT. .. THIS FILE WAS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED BY SPHINX-GALLERY. .. TO MAKE CHANGES, EDIT THE SOURCE PYTHON FILE: .. "examples/mdo/plot_sobieski_use_case.py" .. LINE NUMBERS ARE GIVEN BELOW. .. only:: html .. note:: :class: sphx-glr-download-link-note Click :ref:`here ` to download the full example code .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-example-title .. _sphx_glr_examples_mdo_plot_sobieski_use_case.py: Application: Sobieski's Super-Sonic Business Jet (MDO) ====================================================== .. _sobieski_mdo: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 29-62 This section describes how to setup and solve the MDO problem relative to the :ref:`Sobieski test case ` with |g|. .. seealso:: To begin with a more simple MDO problem, and have a detailed description of how to plug a test case to |g|, see :ref:`sellar_mdo`. .. _sobieski_use_case: Solving with an :ref:`MDF formulation ` -------------------------------------------------------- In this example, we solve the range optimization using the following :ref:`MDF formulation `: - The :ref:`MDF formulation ` couples all the disciplines during the :ref:`mda` at each optimization iteration. - All the :term:`design variables` are equally treated, concatenated in a single vector and given to a single :term:`optimization algorithm` as the unknowns of the problem. - There is no specific :term:`constraint` due to the :ref:`MDF formulation `. - Only the design :term:`constraints` :math:`g\_1`, :math:`g\_2` and :math:`g\_3` are added to the problem. - The :term:`objective function` is the range (the :math:`y\_4` variable in the model), computed after the :ref:`mda`. Imports ------- All the imports needed for the tutorials are performed here. Note that some of the imports are related to the Python 2/3 compatibility. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 62-80 .. code-block:: default from __future__ import division, unicode_literals from matplotlib import pyplot as plt from gemseo.api import ( configure_logger, create_discipline, create_scenario, get_all_inputs, get_all_outputs, get_available_formulations, ) from gemseo.core.jacobian_assembly import JacobianAssembly from gemseo.problems.sobieski.core import SobieskiProblem configure_logger() .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out Out: .. code-block:: none .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 81-87 Step 1: Creation of :class:`.MDODiscipline` ------------------------------------------- To build the scenario, we first instantiate the disciplines. Here, the disciplines themselves have already been developed and interfaced with |g| (see :ref:`benchmark_problems`). .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 87-97 .. code-block:: default disciplines = create_discipline( [ "SobieskiPropulsion", "SobieskiAerodynamics", "SobieskiMission", "SobieskiStructure", ] ) .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 98-105 .. tip:: For the disciplines that are not interfaced with |g|, the |g|'s :mod:`~gemseo.api` eases the creation of disciplines without having to import them. See :ref:`api`. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 107-123 Step 2: Creation of :class:`.Scenario` -------------------------------------- The scenario delegates the creation of the optimization problem to the :ref:`MDO formulation `. Therefore, it needs the list of :code:`disciplines`, the names of the formulation, the name of the objective function and the design space. - The :code:`design_space` (shown below for reference, as :code:`design_space.txt`) defines the unknowns of the optimization problem, and their bounds. It contains all the design variables needed by the :ref:`MDF formulation `. It can be imported from a text file, or created from scratch with the methods :meth:`~gemseo.api.create_design_space` and :meth:`~gemseo.algos.design_space.DesignSpace.add_variable`. In this case, we will create it directly from the API. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 123-124 .. code-block:: default design_space = SobieskiProblem().read_design_space() .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 125-158 .. code:: vi design_space.txt name lower_bound value upper_bound type x_shared 0.01 0.05 0.09 float x_shared 30000.0 45000.0 60000.0 float x_shared 1.4 1.6 1.8 float x_shared 2.5 5.5 8.5 float x_shared 40.0 55.0 70.0 float x_shared 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 float x_1 0.1 0.25 0.4 float x_1 0.75 1.0 1.25 float x_2 0.75 1.0 1.25 float x_3 0.1 0.5 1.0 float y_14 24850.0 50606.9741711 77100.0 float y_14 -7700.0 7306.20262124 45000.0 float y_32 0.235 0.50279625 0.795 float y_31 2960.0 6354.32430691 10185.0 float y_24 0.44 4.15006276 11.13 float y_34 0.44 1.10754577 1.98 float y_23 3365.0 12194.2671934 26400.0 float y_21 24850.0 50606.9741711 77250.0 float y_12 24850.0 50606.9742 77250.0 float y_12 0.45 0.95 1.5 float - The available :ref:`MDO formulations ` are located in the **gemseo.formulations** package, see :ref:`extending-gemseo` for extending GEMSEO with other formulations. - The :code:`formulation` classname (here, :code:`"MDF"`) shall be passed to the scenario to select them. - The list of available formulations can be obtained by using :meth:`~gemseo.api.get_available_formulations`. .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 158-159 .. code-block:: default get_available_formulations() .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out Out: .. code-block:: none ['BiLevel', 'DisciplinaryOpt', 'IDF', 'MDF'] .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 160-164 - :math:`y\_4` corresponds to the :code:`objective_name`. This name must be one of the disciplines outputs, here the "SobieskiMission" discipline. The list of all outputs of the disciplines can be obtained by using :meth:`~gemseo.api.get_all_outputs`: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 164-166 .. code-block:: default get_all_outputs(disciplines) get_all_inputs(disciplines) .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out Out: .. code-block:: none ['y_23', 'x_shared', 'y_32', 'y_14', 'x_1', 'x_2', 'y_31', 'y_24', 'x_3', 'y_21', 'y_34', 'y_12'] .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 167-170 From these :class:`~gemseo.core.discipline.MDODiscipline`, design space filename, :ref:`MDO formulation ` name and objective function name, we build the scenario: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 170-177 .. code-block:: default scenario = create_scenario( disciplines, formulation="MDF", maximize_objective=True, objective_name="y_4", design_space=design_space, ) .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 178-192 The range function (:math:`y\_4`) should be maximized. However, optimizers minimize functions by default. Which is why, when creating the scenario, the argument :code:`maximize_objective` shall be set to :code:`True`. Scenario options ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We may provide additional options to the scenario: **Function derivatives.** As analytical disciplinary derivatives are vailable for Sobieski test-case, they can be used instead of computing the derivatives with finite-differences or with the complex-step method. The easiest way to set a method is to let the optimizer determine it: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 192-193 .. code-block:: default scenario.set_differentiation_method("user") .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 194-219 The default behavior of the optimizer triggers :term:`finite differences`. It corresponds to: .. code:: scenario.set_differentiation_method("finite_differences",1e-7) It it also possible to differentiate functions by means of the :term:`complex step` method: .. code:: scenario.set_differentiation_method("complex_step",1e-30j) Constraints ~~~~~~~~~~~ Similarly to the objective function, the constraints names are a subset of the disciplines' outputs. They can be obtained by using :meth:`~gemseo.api.get_all_outputs`. The formulation has a powerful feature to automatically dispatch the constraints (:math:`g\_1, g\_2, g\_3`) and plug them to the optimizers depending on the formulation. To do that, we use the method :meth:`~gemseo.core.scenario.Scenario.add_constraint`: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 220-222 .. code-block:: default for constraint in ["g_1", "g_2", "g_3"]: scenario.add_constraint(constraint, "ineq") .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 223-228 Step 3: Execution and visualization of the results -------------------------------------------------- The algorithm arguments are provided as a dictionary to the execution method of the scenario: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 228-229 .. code-block:: default algo_args = {"max_iter": 10, "algo": "SLSQP"} .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 230-240 .. warning:: The mandatory arguments are the maximum number of iterations and the algorithm name. Any other options of the optimization algorithm can be prescribed through the argument :code:`algo_options` with a dictionary, e.g. :code:`algo_args = {"max_iter": 10, "algo": "SLSQP": "algo_options": {"ftol_rel": 1e-6}}`. This list of available algorithm options are detailed here: :ref:`gen_opt_algos`. The scenario is executed by means of the line: .. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 240-241 .. code-block:: default scenario.execute(algo_args) .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-script-out Out: .. code-block:: none INFO - 12:59:17: INFO - 12:59:17: *** Start MDO Scenario execution *** INFO - 12:59:17: MDOScenario INFO - 12:59:17: Disciplines: SobieskiPropulsion SobieskiAerodynamics SobieskiMission SobieskiStructure INFO - 12:59:17: MDOFormulation: MDF INFO - 12:59:17: Algorithm: SLSQP INFO - 12:59:17: Optimization problem: INFO - 12:59:17: Minimize: -y_4(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) INFO - 12:59:17: With respect to: x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3 INFO - 12:59:17: Subject to constraints: INFO - 12:59:17: g_1(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) <= 0.0 INFO - 12:59:17: g_2(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) <= 0.0 INFO - 12:59:17: g_3(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) <= 0.0 INFO - 12:59:17: Design space: INFO - 12:59:17: +----------+-------------+-------+-------------+-------+ INFO - 12:59:17: | name | lower_bound | value | upper_bound | type | INFO - 12:59:17: +----------+-------------+-------+-------------+-------+ INFO - 12:59:17: | x_shared | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.09 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_shared | 30000 | 45000 | 60000 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_shared | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_shared | 2.5 | 5.5 | 8.5 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_shared | 40 | 55 | 70 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_shared | 500 | 1000 | 1500 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_1 | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.4 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_1 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.25 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_2 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.25 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: | x_3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1 | float | INFO - 12:59:17: +----------+-------------+-------+-------------+-------+ INFO - 12:59:17: Optimization: 0%| | 0/10 [00:00` and :ref:`IDF ` formulations. Efficiency of linearization is clearly visible has it takes from 10 to 20 times less CPU time to compute analytic derivatives of an :ref:`mda` compared to finite difference and complex step. For :ref:`IDF `, improvements are less consequent, but direct linearization is more than 2.5 times faster than other methods. .. tabularcolumns:: |l|c|c| +-----------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+ | | Execution time (s) | + Derivation Method +------------------------------+------------------------------+ | | :ref:`MDF ` | :ref:`IDF ` | +=======================+==============================+==============================+ | Finite differences | 8.22 | 1.93 | +-----------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+ | Complex step | 18.11 | 2.07 | +-----------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+ | Linearized (direct) | 0.90 | 0.68 | +-----------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+ .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes 2.381 seconds) .. _sphx_glr_download_examples_mdo_plot_sobieski_use_case.py: .. only :: html .. container:: sphx-glr-footer :class: sphx-glr-footer-example .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-python :download:`Download Python source code: plot_sobieski_use_case.py ` .. container:: sphx-glr-download sphx-glr-download-jupyter :download:`Download Jupyter notebook: plot_sobieski_use_case.ipynb ` .. only:: html .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-signature `Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery `_