In this example, we illustrate the use of the QuadApprox plot on the Sobieski’s SSBJ problem.

from __future__ import division, unicode_literals

from matplotlib import pyplot as plt


## Import¶

The first step is to import some functions from the API and a method to get the design space.

from gemseo.api import configure_logger, create_discipline, create_scenario
from gemseo.problems.sobieski.core import SobieskiProblem

configure_logger()


Out:

<RootLogger root (INFO)>


## Description¶

The QuadApprox post-processing performs a quadratic approximation of a given function from an optimization history and plot the results as cuts of the approximation.

## Create disciplines¶

Then, we instantiate the disciplines of the Sobieski’s SSBJ problem: Propulsion, Aerodynamics, Structure and Mission

disciplines = create_discipline(
[
"SobieskiPropulsion",
"SobieskiAerodynamics",
"SobieskiStructure",
"SobieskiMission",
]
)


## Create design space¶

We also read the design space from the SobieskiProblem.

design_space = SobieskiProblem().read_design_space()


## Create and execute scenario¶

The next step is to build an MDO scenario in order to maximize the range, encoded ‘y_4’, with respect to the design parameters, while satisfying the inequality constraints ‘g_1’, ‘g_2’ and ‘g_3’. We can use the MDF formulation, the SLSQP optimization algorithm and a maximum number of iterations equal to 100.

scenario = create_scenario(
disciplines,
formulation="MDF",
objective_name="y_4",
maximize_objective=True,
design_space=design_space,
)
scenario.set_differentiation_method("user")
for constraint in ["g_1", "g_2", "g_3"]:
scenario.execute({"algo": "SLSQP", "max_iter": 10})


Out:

    INFO - 14:42:05:
INFO - 14:42:05: *** Start MDO Scenario execution ***
INFO - 14:42:05: MDOScenario
INFO - 14:42:05:    Disciplines: SobieskiPropulsion SobieskiAerodynamics SobieskiStructure SobieskiMission
INFO - 14:42:05:    MDOFormulation: MDF
INFO - 14:42:05:    Algorithm: SLSQP
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization problem:
INFO - 14:42:05:    Minimize: -y_4(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3)
INFO - 14:42:05:    With respect to: x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3
INFO - 14:42:05:    Subject to constraints:
INFO - 14:42:05:       g_1(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) <= 0.0
INFO - 14:42:05:       g_2(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) <= 0.0
INFO - 14:42:05:       g_3(x_shared, x_1, x_2, x_3) <= 0.0
INFO - 14:42:05: Design space:
INFO - 14:42:05: +----------+-------------+-------+-------------+-------+
INFO - 14:42:05: | name     | lower_bound | value | upper_bound | type  |
INFO - 14:42:05: +----------+-------------+-------+-------------+-------+
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_shared |     0.01    |  0.05 |     0.09    | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_shared |    30000    | 45000 |    60000    | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_shared |     1.4     |  1.6  |     1.8     | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_shared |     2.5     |  5.5  |     8.5     | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_shared |      40     |   55  |      70     | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_shared |     500     |  1000 |     1500    | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_1      |     0.1     |  0.25 |     0.4     | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_1      |     0.75    |   1   |     1.25    | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_2      |     0.75    |   1   |     1.25    | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: | x_3      |     0.1     |  0.5  |      1      | float |
INFO - 14:42:05: +----------+-------------+-------+-------------+-------+
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization:   0%|          | 0/10 [00:00<?, ?it]
/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/gemseo/conda/stable/lib/python3.8/site-packages/scipy/sparse/linalg/dsolve/linsolve.py:407: SparseEfficiencyWarning: splu requires CSC matrix format
warn('splu requires CSC matrix format', SparseEfficiencyWarning)
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization:  20%|██        | 2/10 [00:00<00:00, 53.10 it/sec, obj=2.12e+3]
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization:  40%|████      | 4/10 [00:00<00:00, 21.17 it/sec, obj=3.97e+3]
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization:  50%|█████     | 5/10 [00:00<00:00, 16.52 it/sec, obj=3.96e+3]
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization:  60%|██████    | 6/10 [00:00<00:00, 13.54 it/sec, obj=3.96e+3]
INFO - 14:42:05: Optimization:  70%|███████   | 7/10 [00:00<00:00, 11.47 it/sec, obj=3.96e+3]
INFO - 14:42:06: Optimization:  90%|█████████ | 9/10 [00:01<00:00,  9.77 it/sec, obj=3.96e+3]
INFO - 14:42:06: Optimization: 100%|██████████| 10/10 [00:01<00:00,  9.09 it/sec, obj=3.96e+3]
INFO - 14:42:06: Optimization result:
INFO - 14:42:06: Objective value = 3963.595455433326
INFO - 14:42:06: The result is feasible.
INFO - 14:42:06: Status: None
INFO - 14:42:06: Optimizer message: Maximum number of iterations reached. GEMSEO Stopped the driver
INFO - 14:42:06: Number of calls to the objective function by the optimizer: 12
INFO - 14:42:06: Constraints values:
INFO - 14:42:06:    g_1 = [-0.01814919 -0.03340982 -0.04429875 -0.05187486 -0.05736009 -0.13720854
INFO - 14:42:06:  -0.10279146]
INFO - 14:42:06:    g_2 = 3.236261671801799e-05
INFO - 14:42:06:    g_3 = [-7.67067574e-01 -2.32932426e-01 -9.19662628e-05 -1.83255000e-01]
INFO - 14:42:06: Design space:
INFO - 14:42:06: +----------+-------------+--------------------+-------------+-------+
INFO - 14:42:06: | name     | lower_bound |       value        | upper_bound | type  |
INFO - 14:42:06: +----------+-------------+--------------------+-------------+-------+
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_shared |     0.01    | 0.0600080906541795 |     0.09    | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_shared |    30000    |       60000        |    60000    | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_shared |     1.4     |        1.4         |     1.8     | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_shared |     2.5     |        2.5         |     8.5     | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_shared |      40     |         70         |      70     | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_shared |     500     |        1500        |     1500    | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_1      |     0.1     | 0.3999993439500847 |     0.4     | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_1      |     0.75    |        0.75        |     1.25    | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_2      |     0.75    |        0.75        |     1.25    | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: | x_3      |     0.1     | 0.156230376400943  |      1      | float |
INFO - 14:42:06: +----------+-------------+--------------------+-------------+-------+
INFO - 14:42:06: *** MDO Scenario run terminated in 0:00:01.109866 ***

{'algo': 'SLSQP', 'max_iter': 10}


## Post-process scenario¶

Lastly, we post-process the scenario by means of the QuadApprox plot which performs a quadratic approximation of a given function from an optimization history and plot the results as cuts of the approximation.

Tip

Each post-processing method requires different inputs and offers a variety of customization options. Use the API function get_post_processing_options_schema() to print a table with the options for any post-processing algorithm. Or refer to our dedicated page: Options for Post-processing algorithms.

The first plot shows an approximation of the Hessian matrix $$\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_i \partial x_j}$$ based on the Symmetric Rank 1 method (SR1) [NW06]. The color map uses a symmetric logarithmic (symlog) scale. This plots the cross influence of the design variables on the objective function or constraints. For instance, on the last figure, the maximal second-order sensitivity is $$\frac{\partial^2 -y_4}{\partial^2 x_0} = 2.10^5$$, which means that the $$x_0$$ is the most influential variable. Then, the cross derivative $$\frac{\partial^2 -y_4}{\partial x_0 \partial x_2} = 5.10^4$$ is positive and relatively high compared to the previous one but the combined effects of $$x_0$$ and $$x_2$$ are non-negligible in comparison.

scenario.post_process("QuadApprox", function="-y_4", save=False, show=False)
# Workaround for HTML rendering, instead of show=True
plt.show()

• • The second plot represents the quadratic approximation of the objective around the optimal solution : $$a_{i}(t)=0.5 (t-x^*_i)^2 \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_i^2} + (t-x^*_i) \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i} + f(x^*)$$, where $$x^*$$ is the optimal solution. This approximation highlights the sensitivity of the objective function with respect to the design variables: we notice that the design variables $$x\_1, x\_5, x\_6$$ have little influence , whereas $$x\_0, x\_2, x\_9$$ have a huge influence on the objective. This trend is also noted in the diagonal terms of the Hessian matrix $$\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_i^2}$$.

Total running time of the script: ( 0 minutes 1.845 seconds)

Gallery generated by Sphinx-Gallery