Comparing sensitivity indices

from __future__ import annotations

from gemseo import configure_logger
from gemseo.uncertainty.sensitivity.correlation.analysis import CorrelationAnalysis
from gemseo.uncertainty.sensitivity.morris.analysis import MorrisAnalysis
from gemseo.uncertainty.use_cases.ishigami.ishigami_discipline import IshigamiDiscipline
from gemseo.uncertainty.use_cases.ishigami.ishigami_space import IshigamiSpace

configure_logger()

<RootLogger root (INFO)>

In this example, we consider the Ishigami function [IH90]

\[f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\sin(x_1)+7\sin(x_2)^2+0.1x_3^4\sin(x_1)\]

implemented as an MDODiscipline by the IshigamiDiscipline. It is commonly used with the independent random variables \(X_1\), \(X_2\) and \(X_3\) uniformly distributed between \(-\pi\) and \(\pi\) and defined in the IshigamiSpace.

discipline = IshigamiDiscipline()
uncertain_space = IshigamiSpace()

We would like to carry out two sensitivity analyses, e.g. a first one based on correlation coefficients and a second one based on the Morris methodology, and compare the results,

Firstly, we create a CorrelationAnalysis and compute the sensitivity indices:

correlation = CorrelationAnalysis([discipline], uncertain_space, 10)
correlation.compute_indices()

 WARNING - 13:52:21: No coupling in MDA, switching chain_linearize to True.
    INFO - 13:52:21:
    INFO - 13:52:21: *** Start CorrelationAnalysisSamplingPhase execution ***
    INFO - 13:52:21: CorrelationAnalysisSamplingPhase
    INFO - 13:52:21:    Disciplines: IshigamiDiscipline
    INFO - 13:52:21:    MDO formulation: MDF
    INFO - 13:52:21: Running the algorithm OT_MONTE_CARLO:
    INFO - 13:52:21:     10%|█         | 1/10 [00:00<00:00, 137.96 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     20%|██        | 2/10 [00:00<00:00, 237.97 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     30%|███       | 3/10 [00:00<00:00, 317.11 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     40%|████      | 4/10 [00:00<00:00, 379.67 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     50%|█████     | 5/10 [00:00<00:00, 431.73 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     60%|██████    | 6/10 [00:00<00:00, 474.89 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     70%|███████   | 7/10 [00:00<00:00, 512.77 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     80%|████████  | 8/10 [00:00<00:00, 543.18 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:     90%|█████████ | 9/10 [00:00<00:00, 564.35 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:    100%|██████████| 10/10 [00:00<00:00, 588.67 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21: *** End CorrelationAnalysisSamplingPhase execution (time: 0:00:00.030556) ***

{<Method.KENDALL: 'Kendall'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.55555556]), 'x2': array([0.02222222]), 'x3': array([-0.11111111])}]}, <Method.PCC: 'PCC'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.84696461]), 'x2': array([0.68814608]), 'x3': array([-0.29846394])}]}, <Method.PEARSON: 'Pearson'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.685388]), 'x2': array([0.09681897]), 'x3': array([-0.23027298])}]}, <Method.PRCC: 'PRCC'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.90374102]), 'x2': array([0.76539572]), 'x3': array([-0.02232206])}]}, <Method.SPEARMAN: 'Spearman'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.74545455]), 'x2': array([0.04242424]), 'x3': array([-0.09090909])}]}, <Method.SRC: 'SRC'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.94001308]), 'x2': array([0.55748872]), 'x3': array([-0.16157012])}]}, <Method.SRRC: 'SRRC'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([1.06252802]), 'x2': array([0.60167726]), 'x3': array([-0.00959941])}]}, <Method.SSRC: 'SSRC'>: {'y': [{'x1': array([0.88362459]), 'x2': array([0.31079367]), 'x3': array([0.0261049])}]}}

Then, we create an MorrisAnalysis and compute the sensitivity indices:

morris = MorrisAnalysis([discipline], uncertain_space, 10)
morris.compute_indices()

 WARNING - 13:52:21: No coupling in MDA, switching chain_linearize to True.
 WARNING - 13:52:21: No coupling in MDA, switching chain_linearize to True.
    INFO - 13:52:21:
    INFO - 13:52:21: *** Start MorrisAnalysisSamplingPhase execution ***
    INFO - 13:52:21: MorrisAnalysisSamplingPhase
    INFO - 13:52:21:    Disciplines: _OATSensitivity
    INFO - 13:52:21:    MDO formulation: MDF
    INFO - 13:52:21: Running the algorithm lhs:
    INFO - 13:52:21:     50%|█████     | 1/2 [00:00<00:00, 58.35 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21:    100%|██████████| 2/2 [00:00<00:00, 91.66 it/sec]
    INFO - 13:52:21: *** End MorrisAnalysisSamplingPhase execution (time: 0:00:00.033310) ***

{'MU': {'y': [{'x1': array([0.73532408]), 'x2': array([-0.05115399]), 'x3': array([-1.6024484])}]}, 'MU_STAR': {'y': [{'x1': array([0.76770333]), 'x2': array([2.09435091]), 'x3': array([1.6024484])}]}, 'SIGMA': {'y': [{'x1': array([0.76770333]), 'x2': array([2.09435091]), 'x3': array([1.58984353])}]}, 'RELATIVE_SIGMA': {'y': [{'x1': array([1.]), 'x2': array([1.]), 'x3': array([0.99213399])}]}, 'MIN': {'y': [{'x1': array([0.03237925]), 'x2': array([2.04319692]), 'x3': array([0.01260487])}]}, 'MAX': {'y': [{'x1': array([1.50302741]), 'x2': array([2.14550491]), 'x3': array([3.19229192])}]}}

Lastly, we compare these analyses with the graphical method SensitivityAnalysis.plot_comparison(), either using a bar chart:

morris.plot_comparison(correlation, "y", use_bar_plot=True, save=False, show=True)

<gemseo.post.dataset.bars.BarPlot object at 0x7f2d629fa880>

or a radar plot:

morris.plot_comparison(correlation, "y", use_bar_plot=False, save=False, show=True)

<gemseo.post.dataset.radar_chart.RadarChart object at 0x7f2d3f40ec10>